Difference between revisions of "Blinking Blues"
Russ hensel (talk | contribs) |
Russ hensel (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== What I Expect == | == What I Expect == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The blinks I worked with for this investigation were all in the 1 to 10 ms or so period time frame. I used only the microsecond built in functions. I expected that the timings would: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * be repeatable in the range of a few microseconds. | ||
+ | * be accurate in the range of 10 to 20 microseconds. | ||
== What I Found == | == What I Found == |
Revision as of 08:41, 1 January 2017
Having some trouble with arduino blink. Will write up here. Draft now, not enough to really be of use to anyone but me.
Contents
Origin
I have been messing about with steppers and simple drivers for some time. Recently I put a logic analizer into use and noticed that the switching wave forms were a bit off. Simplifying this I went back to the basic blink and took a look at it. It also had some anomolies. This began an investigation of various blink code and the results. So far I have not found code that gives good results. In this investigation I am focusing on using pulses with half periods of 500 and 5000 micro ( not milli ) seconds.
Blink
What I Expect
The blinks I worked with for this investigation were all in the 1 to 10 ms or so period time frame. I used only the microsecond built in functions. I expected that the timings would:
- be repeatable in the range of a few microseconds.
- be accurate in the range of 10 to 20 microseconds.
What I Found
What I Tried
Things Yet to Try
Some Results
Test Setup
Logic sniffer is the dangerous prototypes single board device http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Logic_Sniffer_101
Measurement taken using the cursor measurement, finding some good pulses at the beginning and then visually scanning, then measuring for bad pulses later on. All recorded to a spreadsheet, that will be uploaded here.