<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.opencircuits.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=61.139.3.134</id>
	<title>OpenCircuits - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.opencircuits.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=61.139.3.134"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.opencircuits.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/61.139.3.134"/>
	<updated>2026-09-13T22:47:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.opencircuits.com/index.php?title=Talk:Open_source_electronics&amp;diff=12147</id>
		<title>Talk:Open source electronics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.opencircuits.com/index.php?title=Talk:Open_source_electronics&amp;diff=12147"/>
		<updated>2007-12-21T13:19:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;61.139.3.134: taacouv&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
dargetno&lt;br /&gt;
darorletovie&lt;br /&gt;
== what kind of page is this ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first version of this [[open source electronics]] page appears to be a cut-and-paste copy of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_hardware Wikipedia:Open source hardware].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What kind of page is this? I see only 3 options:&lt;br /&gt;
* a. Should we try to keep this page slaved to Wikipedia, periodically overwriting this page with the latest version of the Wikipedia page? Then we should add something like the ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:HTML_in_wikitext &amp;quot;This is a copy of the master page at Wikipedia. Do not edit this copy. Edits will be lost in the next update from the master page.&amp;quot;]'' message. Or&lt;br /&gt;
* b. Should we allow this page to diverge from Wikipedia, customizing it to how we at Open Circuits define &amp;quot;open source electronics&amp;quot; and what we find most interesting about it? In particular, we could add &amp;quot;original research&amp;quot; sections that wouldn't be allowed on the Wikipedia page.&lt;br /&gt;
* c. Should we delete this redundant copy of a page, and instead link directly to the latest and most up-to-date original page at Wikipedia?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:32, 12 July 2007 (PDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>61.139.3.134</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>